LAND USE TRENDS
The use of land
shapes every aspect of our society: economic, demographic, environmental, and
others. Market forces, government policies, and cultural practices drive
development and shape patterns of land use. Land use patterns bear a direct
relationship to the costs of providing efficient and adequate public facilities
such as transportation networks, water and sewer infrastructure, schools, and
recreation. Similarly, patterns of development affect the everyday life of
residents by influencing property values, housing availability and cost,
employment opportunities and economic development costs, travel time,
accessibility of services (public and private), and more. Land use patterns
profoundly affect the visual quality of a community, which has implications for
the quality of life and economic development potential. Because the use of land weighs heavily upon
the county’s quality of life and prosperity, it is important to identify
influencing factors and emerging trends, and to use that knowledge to shape
governmental policy.
The following
is a brief analysis of a number of indicators of land use trends affecting
Henderson County.
Parcelization
is the subdivision of land into progressively smaller tracts. Parcelization is a largely irreversible process:
as land reaches higher levels of fragmentation, ownership patterns become more
complex. It therefore becomes
increasingly difficult for an individual to acquire large tracts of property
for large-scale development, agriculture, or other purposes. As large tracts of developable land become
scarce, open space and agricultural lands come under increased pressure to
develop. At the same time, undeveloped
tracts become further and further apart.
This loss of connectivity, in turn, affects the viability of
agriculture, the visual quality of the landscape, and it has profound
implications for the viability of certain native plants and animals.
|
Figure
LU.1 Average Parcel Area, 1997 and 2003 (acres) |
|||
|
1997 |
2003 |
Change |
Percent Change in Average Parcel Size |
|
4.43 |
3.87 |
-0.56 |
-12.60% |
|
Source: Henderson County Assessor’s
Data |
|||
Figure LU.1
shows that during the six-year period between 1997 and 2003, the average parcel
size decreased by more than half an acre in Henderson County, translating to a
12.6% decrease in area.
As depicted by
Figure LU.2, in 1997 and 2003 there were 48,517 and 56,462 parcels of land in
Henderson County, respectively. This corresponds to the formation of an
additional 8,000 parcels, or a 16% increase during that period.
Figure LU.2
shows that Crab Creek, Hoopers Creek and Mills River townships experienced the
greatest percent change (increase) in the number of parcels. Hendersonville, Mills River and Hoopers
Creek saw the largest increases in terms of the number of new parcels as a
percentage of all new parcels.
|
Figure LU.2 Parcels by Township 1997 and 2003 |
|||||
Township
|
1997 |
2003 |
New Parcels
|
Percent Change ‘97 – ‘03 |
Percent of Total New Parcels |
|
Blue Ridge |
4,065 |
4,909 |
844 |
20.8% |
10.6% |
|
Clear Creek |
1,715 |
1,976 |
261 |
15.2% |
3.3% |
|
Crab Creek |
3,379 |
4,286 |
907 |
26.8% |
11.4% |
|
Edneyville |
3,656 |
4,324 |
668 |
18.3% |
8.4% |
|
Green River |
3,602 |
4,323 |
721 |
20.0% |
9.1% |
|
Hendersonville |
21,879 |
24,104 |
2,225 |
10.2% |
28.0% |
|
Hoopers Creek |
4,565 |
5,649 |
1,084 |
23.7% |
13.6% |
|
Mills River |
5,656 |
6,891 |
1,235 |
21.8% |
15.5% |
|
Total |
48,517 |
56,462 |
7,945 |
16.4% |
100.0% |
|
Source: Henderson
County Assessor’s Data |
|||||
Though rural
areas of Henderson County have experienced the highest percent change in
parcelization throughout this period, almost one third of all parcel creation
has taken place in the more urban and suburban areas of the Hendersonville
Township. Rural areas of the county have experienced greater
parcelization due to lower land costs and greater land availability. The urban areas have experienced greater
total parcelization because of the ability to develop at higher-densities due
to the presence of sewer and water and other factors.
Figure LU.2
demonstrates that fragmentation is occurring rapidly in the northern and
western portions of the county (Mills River and Hoopers Creek Townships). Furthermore, it demonstrates that while
urbanized areas have grown more in absolute terms, the percentage change
represents a shift in development away from the urban core towards rural areas.
The majority
of development that has occurred in Henderson County since 1970 consists of
residential dwellings (Figure LU.3). During this period residential units
increased at a steady pace, and if current rates continue, it is estimated that
approximately 10,000 residential structures will be built between 2000 and
2009. It should be noted that the 2000 data does not represent the structural
development of an entire decade.
|
Figure LU.3 Construction Trend by Decade, 1970-2003 |
||||
Building Type
|
1970-1979 |
1980-1989 |
1990-1999 |
2000-2003 |
|
Agriculture/Horticulture |
7 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
|
Commercial |
238 |
300 |
264 |
306 |
|
Community/Cultural |
82 |
81 |
110 |
134 |
|
Industrial |
196 |
240 |
355 |
287 |
|
Recreation |
22 |
34 |
40 |
38 |
|
Residential |
7,876 |
9,257 |
10,172 |
4,229 |
|
Note: The 2000-2003 does not represent an entire decade Source: Henderson
County Assessor’s Data |
||||
Map
# 31 Geographic Distribution of Structure Development (Appendix I)
depicts the cumulative geographical
distribution of structural development from 1970 through 2003.
Figure
LU.4 illustrates the number of structures by township. Along with the preceding parcelization
analysis, Figure LU.4 demonstrates that the central and northern areas of Hendersonville,
Hoopers Creek, and Mills River are where the majority of subdivision and
structural development has occurred. Although Crab Creek has undergone a
greater amount of parcelization, Blue Ridge has experienced a greater amount of
structure development. It is likely that the central and northern areas of the
county will continue to experience high rates of structural development.
Source: Henderson County Assessor’s Data
Forest cover
is a proxy measure of developed and open space. The Henderson County Assessors Office and GIS Department
periodically analyzes changes in forest canopy cover by measuring changes in
forest canopy depicted in aerial photographs.
Figure LU.5 portrays a general trend of deforestation in Henderson
County by analyzing canopy cover variation between 1992 and 2001. During this
nine-year time frame, a 9% change in canopy cover occurred, which translates to
approximately 6,024 forested acres (640 acres per year, on average) having been
cleared. Note that these figures are
not associated with any specific geographic location other than Henderson
County; therefore, localized patterns cannot be established and analyzed. Also,
no data exists concerning the specific uses of cleared acres. Nonetheless, this analysis does depict a
decline in canopy cover within the county, symptomatic of a substantial change
in land use patterns.
|
Figure LU.5 Canopy Cover Assessment, 1992 and 2001 (acres) |
||||
Land Cover
|
1992 |
2001 |
Change |
Percent Change* |
|
Cleared |
70,575 |
76,815 |
6,240 |
9.0% |
|
Forested |
162,839 |
156,815 |
-6,024 |
-3.6% |
|
Source: Henderson
County GIS *Percent change based
upon 1992 baseline for cleared and forested property Note: Laurel Park and Hendersonville were excluded
from this assessment based upon the lack of data |
||||
Deforestation
has numerous implications for the Henderson County. On one hand, it is an indicator of a healthy and beneficial rate
of growth and development. On the other
hand, it raises concerns regarding the destruction of scenic vistas,
fragmentation of habitat and loss of species diversity, threats to water and
air quality, and the loss of open space as well as other aesthetic qualities of
Henderson County. Furthermore, it is
symptomatic of a general decline in the availability of developable space.
Over time,
land use data for Henderson County has been collected through a variety of
means. In order to compare historic and current data sets, it is necessary to
aggregate land use categories. As a
result, the overall conclusions should be considered general in nature.
Figure LU.6
shows changes in land use composition in Henderson County. It depicts a general
increase in developed space and a corresponding decline in undeveloped
space. Residential and non-residential
land uses have increased in area dramatically over the past thirty years while
open space, including agriculture, has considerably decreased. The most significant period was between 1993
and 2003 when open space declined by more than 50,000 acres, or approximately
22%. Conversely, during this same period, urban non-residential and residential
land uses increased by 4.7% and 12.04% respectively.
|
Figure LU.6 Current
and Historical Land Use by Type |
|||
Land Use Type
|
1977 |
1993 |
2003 |
|
Urban Non-Residential |
2,014.16 |
3,046.62 |
9,513.12 |
|
Residential |
10,456.84 |
14,454.18 |
43,251.93 |
|
Open Space |
229,439.00 |
224,420.20 |
175,265.03 |
|
Other |
N/A |
N/A |
12,073.37 |
|
Total |
241,910.00 |
241,921.00 |
240,103.45 |
Land Use Type
|
1977 |
1993 |
2003 |
|
Urban Non-Residential |
0.83% |
1.26% |
3.96% |
|
Residential |
4.32% |
5.97% |
18.01% |
|
Open Space |
94.84% |
92.77% |
73.00% |
|
Other |
N/A |
N/A |
5.03% |
|
Sources: Henderson
County Assessor’s Data, 1977 Land Use Plan, 1993 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Note: The "Other" category exists only for
2003 land use data and is mostly composed of road and rail right-of-ways.
Also note that the discrepancy in total acreage is the result of improvements
in area calculations through the County’s Geographic Information System. |
|||
Change in agricultural
acreage is another good measure of change in development patterns over
time. Figure LU.7, below, indicates
that Henderson County is second only to New Hanover County in terms of farmland
loss in North Carolina between 1987 and 1997.
Furthermore, according to the North Carolina Census of Agriculture and
the United States Department of Agriculture, Henderson County lost farmland at
3.4 % per year in the mid-1990s. It is
anticipated that if the rate of farmland loss continues unchanged, the county
farmland base will decrease by half to roughly 23,000 acres by 2017.
|
Figure LU.7 Land in Farms
(acres) |
||||
|
North Carolina Counties |
Agricultural Census Year |
% Change |
||